Comments on: Operator 0.6.2 is available http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/ Mozilla, money, microformats and more Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:32:05 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mkaply http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-155 mkaply Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:10:07 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-155 Yeah, I definitely am going to work around this in my code. Yeah, I definitely am going to work around this in my code.

]]> By: mkaply http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-154 mkaply Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:20:35 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-154 This is interesting. McAfee attaches "inArray" to every object which is screwing up things. There some info in Japanese on various pages about this. I think I can work around it. This is interesting. McAfee attaches “inArray” to every object which is screwing up things. There some info in Japanese on various pages about this.

I think I can work around it.

]]> By: Paul Martin http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-153 Paul Martin Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:48:51 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-153 I have found another conflict which prevents Operator from working. I traced it down to a conflict with McAfee Site Advisor 26.1. I uninstalled Site Advisor and Operator is working like a champ. McAfee has been notified of the problem. I have found another conflict which prevents Operator from working. I traced it down to a conflict with McAfee Site Advisor 26.1. I uninstalled Site Advisor and Operator is working like a champ. McAfee has been notified of the problem.

]]> By: mkaply http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-152 mkaply Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:42:05 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-152 Having hCalendar sort was a mistake on my part when I was testing out my new sorting algorithm. The only thing I intended to sort was tag. This will be fixed in the next operator. Having hCalendar sort was a mistake on my part when I was testing out my new sorting algorithm.

The only thing I intended to sort was tag.

This will be fixed in the next operator.

]]> By: aswitzer http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-151 aswitzer Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:26:23 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-151 Thank you for your great work on Operator. I implemented hCalendar microformats on a NBA fansite that I run. (I can send you the link but didn't want to plug it needlessly here) I use your extension to add them to Google Calendar, which works great. Because I have a microformat for every game in the remaining NBA season, there are 30+ that show up in the list. Between Operator version 0.6.1 and 0.6.2 it appears that the sorting changed. In the prior version, my hCalendar microformats were sorted chronologically, which was great. In the newer version, they are sorted alphabetically by the event title, which makes it really hard to use. I have to go looking thru the list of events to find the next game to add to my calendar, and in some cases, guess as to which event I want when the title is the same. So, my question is did I miss something in my hCalendar implementation, or would you consider going back to the previous method of sorting in Operator? Thanks! Thank you for your great work on Operator.

I implemented hCalendar microformats on a NBA fansite that I run. (I can send you the link but didn’t want to plug it needlessly here) I use your extension to add them to Google Calendar, which works great. Because I have a microformat for every game in the remaining NBA season, there are 30+ that show up in the list. Between Operator version 0.6.1 and 0.6.2 it appears that the sorting changed. In the prior version, my hCalendar microformats were sorted chronologically, which was great. In the newer version, they are sorted alphabetically by the event title, which makes it really hard to use. I have to go looking thru the list of events to find the next game to add to my calendar, and in some cases, guess as to which event I want when the title is the same.

So, my question is did I miss something in my hCalendar implementation, or would you consider going back to the previous method of sorting in Operator?

Thanks!

]]> By: Dan Champion http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-150 Dan Champion Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:27:28 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-150 Hi Mike Just wanted to say what a great tool Operator is, and how useful I'm finding it for my current project. The debug mode is a god-send. More handlers/actions for hReview would be very cool (post to digg/delicious especially). Dan Hi Mike

Just wanted to say what a great tool Operator is, and how useful I’m finding it for my current project. The debug mode is a god-send.

More handlers/actions for hReview would be very cool (post to digg/delicious especially).

Dan

]]> By: Tim Beadle http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-149 Tim Beadle Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:44:38 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-149 Hi Mike, Great extension, by the way - just what was needed to up the ante re. uf adoption. I'm seeing an issue with vcard export, though: no address fields seem to be exported to the vcard. I've tried this with my own app (p/w protected, unfortunately) and the hCard creator - http://microformats.org/code/hcard/creator - and got the same result. Is this a known bug? Hi Mike,

Great extension, by the way – just what was needed to up the ante re. uf adoption.

I’m seeing an issue with vcard export, though: no address fields seem to be exported to the vcard. I’ve tried this with my own app (p/w protected, unfortunately) and the hCard creator – http://microformats.org/code/hcard/creator – and got the same result.

Is this a known bug?

]]> By: Andy Mabbett http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-148 Andy Mabbett Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:36:09 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-148 P.S. http://lotusnotessucks.4t.com/ & http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1705106,00.html P.S. http://lotusnotessucks.4t.com/ & http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1705106,00.html

]]> By: Andy Mabbett http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-147 Andy Mabbett Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:34:43 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-147 Lotus Notes is an abomination - I have to use it every day, at work :-( Lotus Notes is an abomination – I have to use it every day, at work :-(

]]> By: mkaply http://mike.kaply.com/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-146 mkaply Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:50:19 +0000 http://www.kaply.com/weblog/2007/01/21/operator-062-is-available/#comment-146 Unfortunately, while Notes does import vcards, it doesn't support doing so from a command line. You have to go to address book and select import. Right now I don't have a way to just save the file to disk - that will be in the next version. Unfortunately, while Notes does import vcards, it doesn’t support doing so from a command line. You have to go to address book and select import.

Right now I don’t have a way to just save the file to disk – that will be in the next version.

]]>