<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Self Cleaning Inbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/</link>
	<description>Mozilla, money, microformats and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toe</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Toe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>Some mail providers do this, too.  Like with Dreamhost, if you use IMAP (or their IMAP-based webmail client), after a while old messages are automatically moved to a folder called old-messages.  This is done more to keep your inbox small &amp; server loads light than for organizational purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some mail providers do this, too.  Like with Dreamhost, if you use IMAP (or their IMAP-based webmail client), after a while old messages are automatically moved to a folder called old-messages.  This is done more to keep your inbox small &amp; server loads light than for organizational purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Paul Weber</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Paul Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>It seems like this problem can be also solved (somewhat) by reducing one&#039;s email - ala efail/email reduction by tantek

tantek.pbwiki.com/EmailReduction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like this problem can be also solved (somewhat) by reducing one&#8217;s email &#8211; ala efail/email reduction by tantek</p>
<p>tantek.pbwiki.com/EmailReduction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Pratt</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>This is a fantastic idea, but is unfortunately not support in Gmail, currently. The only time-based filtering Gmail allows you to do is with the &#039;before&#039; and &#039;after&#039; filters, which take static dates as arguments, i.e. no way to filter say all messages older than 3 days.

I&#039;m not overly familiar with mail clients, since I&#039;ve almost exclusively used Gmail&#039;s online interface for years, but there&#039;s probably a way to filter messages this way in something like Outlook, Thunderbird or Apple Mail. And, with Gmail&#039;s IMAP, you should be able to sync it back into the actual Gmail interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fantastic idea, but is unfortunately not support in Gmail, currently. The only time-based filtering Gmail allows you to do is with the &#8216;before&#8217; and &#8216;after&#8217; filters, which take static dates as arguments, i.e. no way to filter say all messages older than 3 days.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not overly familiar with mail clients, since I&#8217;ve almost exclusively used Gmail&#8217;s online interface for years, but there&#8217;s probably a way to filter messages this way in something like Outlook, Thunderbird or Apple Mail. And, with Gmail&#8217;s IMAP, you should be able to sync it back into the actual Gmail interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how you would do this in Gmail?  I think it actually might help my email management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how you would do this in Gmail?  I think it actually might help my email management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Barry</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>With thunderbird:

View -&gt; Threads -&gt; Threads -&gt; Threads with Unread (this way you don&#039;t lose context)

Anything that becomes important I tag.
&#039;
Then I also have search folders for tagged messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With thunderbird:</p>
<p>View -&gt; Threads -&gt; Threads -&gt; Threads with Unread (this way you don&#8217;t lose context)</p>
<p>Anything that becomes important I tag.<br />
&#8216;<br />
Then I also have search folders for tagged messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Roberto</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had that exact same idea too. It occurred to me when noticing that my Gmail said &#039;Inbox (1008)&#039; - when actually it&#039;s be more useful if the number in parenthesis was the number of new and unread e-mails &lt;i&gt;since the last time I logged in&lt;/i&gt; - ie, discounting all the e-mails which I&#039;d already ignored.

How are you setting up your Gmail rules?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had that exact same idea too. It occurred to me when noticing that my Gmail said &#8216;Inbox (1008)&#8217; &#8211; when actually it&#8217;s be more useful if the number in parenthesis was the number of new and unread e-mails <i>since the last time I logged in</i> &#8211; ie, discounting all the e-mails which I&#8217;d already ignored.</p>
<p>How are you setting up your Gmail rules?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurens Holst</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurens Holst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>What’s wrong with just having a couple of thousand emails in your inbox? Filters move mailinglist mails into separate folders, but my inbox contains all my personal mail and goes pretty far back…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s wrong with just having a couple of thousand emails in your inbox? Filters move mailinglist mails into separate folders, but my inbox contains all my personal mail and goes pretty far back…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db48x</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>db48x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>Actually it&#039;s not really a new idea. My email client (Gnus) is something like 20 years old, and it&#039;s always worked that way. I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it&#8217;s not really a new idea. My email client (Gnus) is something like 20 years old, and it&#8217;s always worked that way. I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have anything to automatically clear out my inbox, but my inbox is almost permanently empty. If a mail requires no work (junk, or just info) then I move it to the appropriate folder. If it requires work then I generally take care of it there and then and move it out, it stays in my inbox as a permanent reminder that something needs to be done. My urge to keep the inbox clean makes me do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have anything to automatically clear out my inbox, but my inbox is almost permanently empty. If a mail requires no work (junk, or just info) then I move it to the appropriate folder. If it requires work then I generally take care of it there and then and move it out, it stays in my inbox as a permanent reminder that something needs to be done. My urge to keep the inbox clean makes me do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=156#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly what I do with thunderbird + our trac emails.

It&#039;s also pretty much exactly what google reader does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what I do with thunderbird + our trac emails.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also pretty much exactly what google reader does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  mike.kaply.com/2008/08/03/a-self-cleaning-inbox/feed/ ) in 0.35303 seconds, on May 21st, 2012 at 8:44 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2012 at 9:44 am UTC -->
