<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla No Longer Allows Firefox Community Editions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/</link>
	<description>Mozilla, money, microformats and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:32:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Mabbett</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Mabbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they took umbrage at your continued use of a Firefox2 download logo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they took umbrage at your continued use of a Firefox2 download logo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>&quot;But Mr. Dent, the plans have been available in the local planning office for the last nine months.&quot;

   &quot;Oh yes, well, as soon as I heard I went straight round to see them, yesterday afternoon. You hadn&#039;t exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them, had you? I mean, like actually telling anybody or anything.&quot;

   &quot;But the plans were on display...&quot;

   &quot;On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.&quot;

   &quot;That&#039;s the display department.&quot;

   &quot;With a flashlight.&quot;

   &quot;Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.&quot;

   &quot;So had the stairs.&quot;

   &quot;But look, you found the notice, didn&#039;t you?&quot;

   &quot;Yes,&quot; said Arthur, &quot;yes I did. It was on display on the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying &#039;Beware of the Leopard.&#039;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But Mr. Dent, the plans have been available in the local planning office for the last nine months.&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;Oh yes, well, as soon as I heard I went straight round to see them, yesterday afternoon. You hadn&#8217;t exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them, had you? I mean, like actually telling anybody or anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;But the plans were on display&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;That&#8217;s the display department.&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;With a flashlight.&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;So had the stairs.&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;But look, you found the notice, didn&#8217;t you?&#8221;</p>
<p>   &#8220;Yes,&#8221; said Arthur, &#8220;yes I did. It was on display on the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying &#8216;Beware of the Leopard.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkaply</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>mkaply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Can someone point me to one of these supposed malware Firefox Community Editions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone point me to one of these supposed malware Firefox Community Editions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Anderson</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this out, we&#039;re fixing the page. It shouldn&#039;t be 404. The new text will include the rationale on why the program was discontinued, and clarify that there&#039;s no impact on past users.  The proposed termination was discussed publicly in governance late last year see: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94%3flnk=gst&amp;q=community+edition. The updates to the TM policy are still being worked on and will be posted to governance in the next few weeks. It&#039;s taken longer than expected, but those changes are largely conforming relative to the discontinuance of community edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this out, we&#8217;re fixing the page. It shouldn&#8217;t be 404. The new text will include the rationale on why the program was discontinued, and clarify that there&#8217;s no impact on past users.  The proposed termination was discussed publicly in governance late last year see: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94%3flnk=gst&#038;q=community+edition" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94%3flnk=gst&#038;q=community+edition</a>. The updates to the TM policy are still being worked on and will be posted to governance in the next few weeks. It&#8217;s taken longer than expected, but those changes are largely conforming relative to the discontinuance of community edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent James</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been following the blog threads about monetization surrounding the Mozilla community lately, and the general gist that I have is that at some level there is a desire to make it easier to do - but there are some significant conflicts with the overall community culture that have not been resolved. Efforts like FrontMotion I hope are appreciated. I certainly hope that they can find a way to allow such efforts to continue to use Mozilla trademarks in an appropriate manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following the blog threads about monetization surrounding the Mozilla community lately, and the general gist that I have is that at some level there is a desire to make it easier to do &#8211; but there are some significant conflicts with the overall community culture that have not been resolved. Efforts like FrontMotion I hope are appreciated. I certainly hope that they can find a way to allow such efforts to continue to use Mozilla trademarks in an appropriate manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurens Holst</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurens Holst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>Relevant thread in mozilla.governance (per the comment in the bug):

http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/6dd46ec1441a6b6e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relevant thread in mozilla.governance (per the comment in the bug):</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/6dd46ec1441a6b6e" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/6dd46ec1441a6b6e</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Smedberg</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Smedberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>The change in policy was proposed to mozilla.governance a while back: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94?lnk=gst&amp;q=community+edition#30fbd6d708c2bb94

But I&#039;m surprised that it was only partly-implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The change in policy was proposed to mozilla.governance a while back: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94?lnk=gst&#038;q=community+edition#30fbd6d708c2bb94" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94?lnk=gst&#038;q=community+edition#30fbd6d708c2bb94</a></p>
<p>But I&#8217;m surprised that it was only partly-implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey Ardisson</title>
		<link>http://mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey Ardisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/?p=258#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>I recall seeing some discussion of the proposal a while ago on .governance (wow, it looks like it was all the way back in September!: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94 ), but I don&#039;t recall ever seeing an announcement that there was a final decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall seeing some discussion of the proposal a while ago on .governance (wow, it looks like it was all the way back in September!: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/2903bc645085b41d/30fbd6d708c2bb94</a> ), but I don&#8217;t recall ever seeing an announcement that there was a final decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  mike.kaply.com/2009/04/03/mozilla-no-longer-allows-firefox-community-editions/feed/ ) in 0.47464 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 4:56 am CST. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 5:56 am CST -->
